Page 1 of 1

Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 6:39 am
by nickzark
18E44D8A-56CA-4CEC-AC4C-79E984960D56.jpeg
18E44D8A-56CA-4CEC-AC4C-79E984960D56.jpeg (206.34 KiB) Viewed 16364 times
A6CB929F-67F8-45DF-A5F0-730537485DB0.jpeg
A6CB929F-67F8-45DF-A5F0-730537485DB0.jpeg (521.6 KiB) Viewed 16362 times
[

https://photos.app.goo.gl/RiCLJDuxKgvWfNwC9

https://photos.app.goo.gl/n2xVcCsFN7iNgtaJ6

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signature

Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:01 am
by nickzark
Sorry for photos try to understand how to post them

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 8:46 am
by Mark
I think they both are genuine.

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:14 am
by nickzark
Thank you very much

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 6:34 pm
by SavageADMIN
I'm not sure in the authenticity of the signed HIStory era promotional photo. MJ used to stop the lines in loops. At the end of the "M" and ichaeL and the bottom of the J and the very end letter. But on that signature there are absolutely no sudden stops. So I doubt it. There is an Italian or Spanish forger who can write in this style, check out this fake signature, almost the same style

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2022 7:06 pm
by nickzark
It has same points . But see and difference. Don’t see the star in the end . Don’t know to be true

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2022 6:45 pm
by nickzark
Someone else ?? The history was bought from England if that helps

Re: Opinion about Michael Jackson signatures

Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2022 7:01 am
by Omega
I'm with savageadmin, the signature on the screem promo photo looks questionable for me, I bet it's fake. The beat it signature looks much better.